论既有侵权责任构成要件理论的困境及其出路——“二分法”理论的提出

既有侵权责任构成要件理论，面，临着“精神分裂式”的自我冲突：一方面，立法扬弃大陆法系传统，确立多元责任承担方式；而另一方面，理论却固守大陆法系传统．承继损害赔偿责任构成要件理论。为避免创新与保守的自我冲突，我们须构建能够囊括全部责任承担方式的侵权责任构成要件理论——“退出式责任”与“割让式责任”二分法的侵权责任构成要件理论：退出式责任的构成要件仅为侵权行为，无需损害、因果关系，无需考虑过错；割让式责任则可沿袭适用传统损害赔偿责任构成要件理论。

The Dilemma of the Theory of Elements of Tort Liability and Its Solution

The theory of elements of tort liability , is facing a "schizophrenic" self-conflict: on the one hand, the legislature abandoned the tradition of family of civil law, established multiple style of responsibility; on the other hand, the theory sticks to the tradition of family of civil law, inherited of the theory of elements of damages. To avoid the conflict of innovation and conservative, we must create new theory of elements of tort liability the theory of elements of tort liability based on the classification of "exit-type responsibility" and "ceded style responsibility": the element of exit-type responsibility is tort, without regard to damage, causation and fault; the elements of ceded responsibility may follow the theory of elements of damages.