自由心证的类型化分析

作为对法定证据制度之辩证否定的自由心证制度,其根本要求是法律对证明力不做具体规定,而交由裁判者自主裁量。在证据能力方面两大法系采取了各不相同的做法,其中英美法系采取的是证明力的自由评价与证据能力的法定主义,大陆法系国家和地区对证据能力和证明力均采取自由评价制度。两大法系在证据能力方面的不同态度,使自由心证表现为两种不同的类型。受诉讼价值目标、审判组织结构等方面的影响,我国自由心证的技术建构应当选择大陆法系的立法模式。

Classified Analysis of Free Evidence Evaluation

In fact the 'free evidence evaluation' was developed by negating the legal evidence evaluation, Its essential content is that the value of the evidence is prescribed not by law,but by the judge,who can evaluate the evidence freely.In view of the competency of evidence,the two legal systems,adopt different methods.In common law countries,the law stipulates the evidence competency and the judge cannot evaluate the evidence freely.In civil law countries,the free evaluation system is applicable to both competen...