| 25例医疗纠纷的法医临床学鉴定回顾性分析 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 张玲莉,李强,陈晓瑞,赵小红. 25例医疗纠纷的法医临床学鉴定回顾性分析[J]. 中国法医学杂志, 2005, 20(2): 103-105 |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 张玲莉 李强 陈晓瑞 赵小红 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 华中科技大学同济医学院法医学系,湖北,武汉,430030 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 目的探讨医疗纠纷的法医临床学鉴定及其相关问题。方法对25例医疗纠纷案例资料进行了回顾性整理分析。结果医疗失误16例,其中有不良后果的10例,均发生于手术科室;无医疗失误9例。结论医疗纠纷法医学鉴定过程中认定医疗失误是基础,认定医疗失误与不良后果的关系是关键。
|
| 关 键 词： | 法医临床学 医疗纠纷 法医学鉴定 |
| 文章编号： | 1001-5728(2005)02-0103-03 |
| 修稿时间： | 2003-12-01 |
Clinical forensic expertise and analysis on 25 cases of suspected medical malpractice |
| |
| ZHANG Ling-li,LI Qiang,CHENG Xiao-rui,et al.. Clinical forensic expertise and analysis on 25 cases of suspected medical malpractice[J]. Chinese Journal of Forensic Medicine, 2005, 20(2): 103-105 |
| |
| Authors: | ZHANG Ling-li LI Qiang CHENG Xiao-rui et al. |
| |
| Affiliation: | ZHANG Ling-li,LI Qiang,CHENG Xiao-rui,et al./ Department of Forensic Medicine,Tongji Medical College,Huazhong University of Science and Technology,Wuhan 430030) |
| |
| Abstract: | Objective To investigate the clinical forensic assessment on cases of suspected medical malpractice and the other related aspects concerning the assessment in clinical forensic expertise. Methods Clinical data from 25 cases expertized for suspicion of medical malpractice were retrospectively analyzed. Results 16 cases were due to the medical muff (10 cases of 16 medical muff had a bad consequence and happened in the department of operation, 6 cases had not ones); 9 cases were non-medical muff. Conclusion Though the medical muff recognized is basic, but the relationship between the medical muff and the following bad results of medical muff is the best key for the forensic expertise. Otherwise, the scientific and practical value must be considered in the forensic expertise. |
| |
| Keywords: | Clinical forensic medicine Medical muff Forensic expertise |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
|
