首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

不当得利与侵占罪之界分
引用本文:牛月姣. 不当得利与侵占罪之界分[J]. 山西省政法管理干部学院学报, 2012, 25(1): 122-123
作者姓名:牛月姣
作者单位:山西省太原市晋源区人民检察院,山西太原,030025
摘    要:文章分析了遗失物与遗忘物之间的刑民交错关系,指出拒不交出他人遗忘物的应当以侵占罪论处;拾得他人遗失物拒不返还的应是不当得利行为。侵占罪属于一种恶意的不当得利,要求占有人返还原物,而不当得利则不受此限。应从法理和司法实践上正确认定此类案件。

关 键 词:遗失物  遗忘物  侵占罪  不当得利

Distinction and Definition of Unjust Enrichment and Embezzlement
NIU Yue-jiao. Distinction and Definition of Unjust Enrichment and Embezzlement[J]. Journal of Shanxi Politics and Law Institute for Administrators, 2012, 25(1): 122-123
Authors:NIU Yue-jiao
Affiliation:NIU Yue-jiao(Jinyuan District People’s Court,Taiyuan Shanxi 030025,China)
Abstract:The author analyzes the mixed criminal and civil relationship between lost property and forgotten objects,and states that:those who refuse to hand over other people’s forgotten objects should be punished for embezzlement;those who pick up but refuse to return other people’s lost property should be identified as unjust enrichment.Embezzlement is a malicious unjust enrichment, which requires that the occupants should return the objects,while unjust enrichment is not subject to this limit. These cases should be identified correctly through legal principle and judicial practice.
Keywords:lost property  forgotten objects  embezzlement  unjust enrichment
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号