首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

思考在证据“拿来”之后——威格摩尔证明表格的逻辑化倾向及启示
引用本文:李树真. 思考在证据“拿来”之后——威格摩尔证明表格的逻辑化倾向及启示[J]. 政法论丛, 2008, 0(6): 84-88
作者姓名:李树真
作者单位:中国政法大学刑事司法学院,北京,100088
摘    要:人们普遍承认在由证据法学向证明法学转向过程中,威格摩尔是一位具有宏阔战略眼光的人物,但对反映其司法证明科学理论的著作《建立在逻辑学、心理学和一般生活经验基础上的司法证明原则》并未给予应有的重视。这主要与当时普遍重视证据规则立法、相对轻视司法证明内在结构与原则的研究不无关系。现在英美国家的证据规则立法已充分发达,而影响证据立法的体制与主要因素已有所变化,重新认识其司法证明的基本原则与方法论倾向会对预测证据法晕的发展趋蛰与我国的证据立法实践有重要现实意义。

关 键 词:证据法学转向  司法证明  司法证明的逻辑

Tmnking after Evidence Produced——The Logical Tendencv of Wigmore''S Diagram of Proof and Its Indication
Li Shu-zhen. Tmnking after Evidence Produced——The Logical Tendencv of Wigmore''S Diagram of Proof and Its Indication[J]. Journal of Political Science and Law, 2008, 0(6): 84-88
Authors:Li Shu-zhen
Affiliation:Li Shu-zhen(School of Criminal , Judicial Law,China University of Political Science , Law,Beijing 100088)
Abstract:It is known generally that John Henry Wigmore have a profound effect on orientational transformation of study of evidence law from evidence to proof ,but people seldom pay more attention to his book The Principles of Judicial Proof As Given By Logic ,Psychology ,And General Experience which focuses on his theory about so-called science of judicial proof. The reason may be that at that time people pay more attention to establishment of evidence rules, accordingly ignoring of the study on inner construction a...
Keywords:orientation transformation of the study of evidence law  judicial proof  logic for judicial proof  
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号