Truth and Justice, Inquiry and Advocacy, Science and Law |
| |
| Authors: | Susan Haack Cooper Senior Scholar in Arts and Sciences Professor of Philosophy Professor of Law |
| |
| Institution: | University of Miami, Department of Philosophy, USA |
| |
| Abstract: | Abstract. There is tension between the adversarialism of the U.S. legal culture and the investigative procedures of the sciences, and between the law's concern for finality and the open‐ended fallibilism of science. A long history of attempts to domesticate scientific testimony by legal rules of admissibility has left federal judges with broad screening responsibilities; recent adaptations of adversarialism in the form of court‐appointed experts have been criticized as “inquisitorial,” even “undemocratic.” In exploring their benefits and disadvantages, it would make sense to look to the experience of other legal systems. |
| |
| Keywords: | |
|
|
