首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

论过失
引用本文:山口厚,付立庆. 论过失[J]. 河南省政法管理干部学院学报, 2010, 25(5): 39-48
作者姓名:山口厚  付立庆
作者单位:1. [日]东京大学,大学院,日本,东京,113-8654
2. 中国人民大学,法学院,北京,100872
摘    要:立足于结果无价值论的旧过失论立场,过失就是对于客观的构成要件要素的认识与预见可能性,实务上理解的过失是注意义务违反,界定了其与旧过失论之间的关系,结果回避义务与客观的构成要件该当性相关,而作为责任要素,则应该要求对于引起构成要件该当事实的预见可能性与预见义务的违反。

关 键 词:旧过失论  预见可能性  结果回避义务  信赖原则  监督过失  管理过失

On Negligence Theory
Yamaguchi Atsushi,Fu Liqing. On Negligence Theory[J]. Journal of Henan Administrative Institute of Politics and Law, 2010, 25(5): 39-48
Authors:Yamaguchi Atsushi  Fu Liqing
Affiliation:Yamaguchi Atsushi, Fu Liqing ( University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan ;Renmin University of China, Beijing 100872)
Abstract:On the point of negligence of worthless consequence theory, this essay argues that negligence means possibility of recognizing and foreseeing to the objective element of Tatbestand, then criticizes theory of the present and the update negligence( threatening feeling theory). The writer points out that negligence at practical level is violation of care duty, and defines relationship between this kind of negligence and traditional negligence theory. This essay focuses on negligence offender' s elements after discussing two particular circumstances, which contains the allowed risk and negligence co-existence, it believes consequence avoiding duty relating to Tatbestand, however, Schlud' s essence is violation of Tatstand' s foreseeing possibility and obligation.
Keywords:traditional negligence theory  foreseeing possibility  duty of consequence avoiding  trust principle  the negligence in the supervision  the negligence in the management
本文献已被 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号