A Tangled Web: Complexity and Inequality in the English Local Government Finance Settlement |
| |
Authors: | Alex Gibson Sheena Asthana |
| |
Affiliation: | 1. Faculty of Health, Education and Society , University of Plymouth , Plymouth , UK Alex.Gibson@plymouth.ac.uk;3. Faculty of Health, Education and Society , University of Plymouth , Plymouth , UK |
| |
Abstract: | The £29 billion formula grant stands at the heart of the English local government finance system. This transfer of resource from central to local government has, since 2006–07, been distributed using the so-called ‘four block model’. This extraordinarily complex formula-based funding mechanism aims to ensure that all local authorities are able to provide individuals with a broadly comparable level of public service – offering greatest support to local authorities with high service needs and/or low capacity to raise revenue. This paper outlines the structure and workings of the four block model and, drawing attention to key methodological shortcomings, explains why the resulting distribution of the formula grant is both arbitrary and inequitable. In particular it argues that key model parameters – specifically the need and resource equalisation proportions – are set in order to fulfil a particular funding outcome. This flies in the face of the basic tenets of resource allocation methodology in that, being outcome-led, the approach is clearly neither need-based nor impartial. The paper argues that the four block model fails to meet its own goal of fiscal equalisation, is likely to lead to increasing service disparities, and must be replaced as a matter of urgency. |
| |
Keywords: | Formula funding four block model fiscal equalisation resource allocation local government |
|
|