What doctors and policymakers should know: Battered women's views about mandatory medical reporting laws |
| |
Authors: | J.D Alisa Smith Kristin Parsons Winokur |
| |
Affiliation: | a Ramapo College of New Jersey, School of Social Science and Human Services, 505 Ramapo Valley Road, Mahwah, New Jersey 07430, USA b Justice Research Center, 443 East College Avenue, Tallahassee, Florida 32301, USA |
| |
Abstract: | Medical professionals in forty-five states and the District of Colombia are under a legal obligation to report a variety of injuries to the police, including those believed to be the result of domestic violence. Responses to these laws by doctors and battered women have been mixed. Using logistic regression analysis, this study explored battered women's views about mandatory medical reporting laws controlling for and examining a variety of demographic, situational, and legal factors. Three of the four dependent attitudinal measures (perceptions of general support for mandatory reporting as well as perceived benefits of the law for themselves and others) demonstrated little variation across all factors. The fourth measure - willingness to seek medical care in communities with a mandatory law - however, produced a number of significant relationships among the demographic, situational and legal factors. The results and policy implications of these findings are discussed. |
| |
Keywords: | |
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录! |
|