首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

刑事诉讼法修改如何调整证据制度
引用本文:龙宗智,苏云.刑事诉讼法修改如何调整证据制度[J].现代法学,2011(6):116-122.
作者姓名:龙宗智  苏云
作者单位:四川大学法学院;西南财经大学法学院;
摘    要:证据概念以材料说代替事实说欠妥,可以考虑三种处理方式,倾向于删去关于证据定义的规定。证据分类应注意笔录证据规定的周延性,不应仅限于列举的几种,还应包含其他侦查行为笔录及审判笔录。证据排除规则,应当根据实践需要进一步明确排除范围,尤其对"等"字应作适当界定,防止过于宽泛无法把握。直接言辞证据规则,不仅需要规定证人出庭义务及保障措施,更应当限制书面证词的使用。就行政机关所取证据的司法运用,应当明确限制行政执法机关所取言词证据用于司法。有必要规定证据裁判原则;必须遵守质证原则,反对脱离庭审秘密核实证据。

关 键 词:刑事诉讼  法律修改  证据制度  调整改革

Amending Rules of Evidence While Modifying Criminal Procedure Law
LONG Zong-zhi,SU Yun.Amending Rules of Evidence While Modifying Criminal Procedure Law[J].Modern Law Science,2011(6):116-122.
Authors:LONG Zong-zhi  SU Yun
Institution:LONG Zong-zhi1,SU Yun2 (1.Law School of Sichuan University,Chengdu 610064,2.Law School of Southwestern Unviersity of Finance and Economics,Chengdu 610074,China)
Abstract:The idea of replacing fact doctrine with material doctrine is by no means proper while in the 3 alternatives deletion of the provisions concerning definition of evidence is of priority.As for classification of evidence,heed should be paid to extension of record evidence that should include other investigation and trial records rather than those illustrated in the provisions.Exclusionary rules should specify what are to be excluded in light of practical demand.Especially,the term and so on should be properly...
Keywords:criminal procedure  law amendment  evidence law  adjustment and reform  
本文献已被 CNKI 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号