At the frontiers of scientific advancement: the factors that influence scientists to become or choose to become publicly funded principal investigators |
| |
Authors: | James A. Cunningham Vincent Mangematin Conor O’Kane Paul O’Reilly |
| |
Affiliation: | 1.J.E. Cairnes School of Business & Economics and the Whitaker Institute,National University of Ireland, Galway,Galway,Ireland;2.Grenoble Ecole de Management,Grenoble,France;3.Department of Management,University of Otago,Dunedin,New Zealand;4.College of Business,Dublin Institute of Technology,Dublin 2,Ireland |
| |
Abstract: | This paper aims to unearth the factors that influence scientists in becoming and choosing to become publicly funded principal investigators (PIs). PIs are the linchpins of knowledge transformation and bridging triple helix actors, particularly academia-industry. At a micro level, PIs are at the nexus of engaging and interacting with other triple helix actors. No study to date has specifically focused on the factors that influence scientists to become or choose to become publicly funded PIs. For scientists taking on the role of a PI represents an important landmark in their research career. Set in an Irish research system we found two main categories of influencing factors—push and pull. Pull factors are where the PI has more choice in choosing to become a PI, where as push factors is where the PI has less choice in choosing to become a PI. Pull factors we identified were control, career ambition and advancement, personal drive and ambition. Pull factors we identified were project dependencies and institutional pressures. |
| |
Keywords: | |
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录! |
|