最新司法解释视野下的扒窃司法适用

2013年4月4日,最高人民法院和最高人民检察院联合颁布了关于盗窃的司法解释,其中对扒窃行为进行了明确限定。但这一司法解释对扒窃的行为方式等仍未细化,笔者认为其构成要件需要明确的是:公共交通工具是对扒窃场所的注意性规定;随身携带的范围仅包含贴身范围、可控制范围,排除不可控制范围;扒窃对象仅限于体积应当较小的财物;扒窃不是行为犯,其存在着未遂的犯罪形态;携带凶器可作为量刑情节来考虑,并不是扒窃的基本构成要件。

Judicial Application on the Pickpocket in View of the Latest Judicial Interpretation

On April 4th 2013, Supreme People＇ s Court and Supreme People＇ s Procuratorate jointly issued judicial interpretation on stealing and defined pickpocket clearly in it. However,this judicial interpretation did not segment the behavior way of pickpocket. The author thought we should make clear the constitutive requirements, which include public transportation tool is the attentive regulation on pickpocket place ; the scope of accompany only means next to the shin, controllable and uncontrollable excluded ; objects of pickpocket are only limited to minor things in size;pickpocket is not offense of act and it has the state of criminal attempt;arms bearing could be considered as penalty measurement circumstances but not as the basic constitute of pickpocket.