| 论不真正不作为犯的作为义务来源 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 刘璐. 论不真正不作为犯的作为义务来源[J]. 国家检察官学院学报, 2005, 13(3): 113-117 |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 刘璐 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 中国人民公安大学 北京 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 对于不真正不作为犯的义务来源,学说史上共形成了三种作为义务说,即形式的作为义务说、实质的作为义务说和二元的作为义务说。通过对以上学说的深入分析和探讨,二元作为义务说应更具合理性。不真正不作为犯的作为义务来源应是实质要素与形式要素的统一,前者界定了作为义务的事实性根据,后者则统一了作为义务的规范性要式。
|
| 关 键 词： | 不真正不作为犯 作为义务 实质要素 形式要素 |
| 文章编号： | 1004-9428(2005)03-0113-05 |
On the Origin of the Act Obligation of False Negative Crime |
| |
| Liu Lu. On the Origin of the Act Obligation of False Negative Crime[J]. journal of national prosecutors college, 2005, 13(3): 113-117 |
| |
| Authors: | Liu Lu |
| |
| Abstract: | There are three theories of act obligation about the origin of obligation of false negative crime which are formal act obligation theory,substantial act obligation theory,and dual act obligation theory.In comparison with other theories,the dual act obligation theory is more rational.The origin of act obligation of false negative crime shall be the unification of substantial el- ement and formal element,the former confirmed the factual bases of act obligation,and the latter unified the normative forma- tion of act obligation. |
| |
| Keywords: | false negative crime act obligation substantial element formal element |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
