首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

抗辩权利论
引用本文:韩明志. 抗辩权利论[J]. 河北法学, 2004, 22(1): 98-103
作者姓名:韩明志
作者单位:上海市诚谊律师事务所,上海,200135
摘    要:抗辩权与请求权居于相对立的地位,随着请求权的产生而同时产生。在法律关系中,一方当事人行使请求权,要求相对人作为或不作为时,相对人得提出各种理由,包括实体上的和程序上的,进行抗辩,对抗当事人的请求权,故而形成了请求权与抗辩的对立。作为抗辩的权利,分为实体抗辩和程序上的抗辩,从实体和程序两方面对抗辩权利进行分析。

关 键 词:抗辩权  抗辩事由  诉讼程序  答辩  否认
文章编号:1002-3933(2004)01-0098-06
修稿时间:2003-05-29

An Analysis of the Right of Pleadings
HAN Ming-zhi. An Analysis of the Right of Pleadings[J]. Hebei Law Science, 2004, 22(1): 98-103
Authors:HAN Ming-zhi
Abstract:The relationship between the right of pleadings and the right of claim is opposite. And the right of pleading comes into being with the appearance of the right of claim. In legal relationship, when one party exercise the right of claim, requiring the other party to do something or not to do something, the other party can raise a plead, including procedure and substantive, to counter the claim, thus appears the opposite relationship between the right of pleadings and the right of claim. Theright of pleadings is divided into substantive pleading and procedural pleading.Analyses the right of pleadings from substantive and procedural aspects.
Keywords:right of pleadings  ground of pleading  judicial procedure  defend oneself  disclaim
本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号