| 论司法ADR |
| |
| 引用本文： | 孙建. 论司法ADR[J]. 山东行政学院学报, 2004, 0(6): 52-53 |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 孙建 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 南京师范大学,江苏南京 210097 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 经过多年的争论 ,人们对于非诉讼程序 (ADR)已基本达成这样一个共识 :即对于在国外比较流行的非诉讼程序 (ADR) ,如今的问题不在于是否需要引用 ,而是在于应当如何使用。而司法ADR作为ADR的一种重要的形式 ,由于其与司法系统的紧密联系 ,因而具有自身的特点
|
| 关 键 词： | 非诉讼程序(ADR) 司法ADR 制度化 |
| 文章编号： | 1008-3154(2004)06-0052-02 |
| 修稿时间： | 2004-08-19 |
On the Theory of the Summary in Terms of Judicial ADR |
| |
| Sun Jian. On the Theory of the Summary in Terms of Judicial ADR[J]. Journal of Shandong Administrative College and Shandong Economic Management Personnel College, 2004, 0(6): 52-53 |
| |
| Authors: | Sun Jian |
| |
| Abstract: | Through dispute for more than ten years, people to Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) have reached common understanding basically already. That does not lie in the question of quoting but lie in f how to use. And judicial ADR regard as one important form of ADR, because of the close connection of judicial system, have one's own characteristics. |
| |
| Keywords: | Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) Judicial ADR Institutionalized |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
