首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

恶意透支型信用卡诈骗司法认定中若干疑难问题探析
引用本文:胡静,魏亚男. 恶意透支型信用卡诈骗司法认定中若干疑难问题探析[J]. 北京政法职业学院学报, 2012, 0(1): 65-68
作者姓名:胡静  魏亚男
作者单位:北京市朝阳区人民检察院公诉三处;北京市朝阳区人民检察院公诉三处
摘    要:最高人民法院、最高人民检察院联合发布的《关于办理妨害信用卡管理刑事案件具体应用法律若干问题的解释》对恶意透支作出了进一步规定,并确定了经发卡银行两次催收后超过三个月仍不归还的限制条件。但在司法实践中,对于如何理解经发卡银行两次催收后超过三个月仍不归还、两次催收的认定、三个月的宽限期计算等问题仍存在争议,本文试对以上几个问题进行探讨。

关 键 词:恶意透支  以非法占有为目的  两次催收  超过三个月仍不归还

Difficult Issues Concerning Judicial Determination of the Credit Card Fraud of Malicious Overdraft
Hu Jing and Wei Yanan. Difficult Issues Concerning Judicial Determination of the Credit Card Fraud of Malicious Overdraft[J]. bejing college of political science and law journal, 2012, 0(1): 65-68
Authors:Hu Jing and Wei Yanan
Affiliation:Hu Jing and Wei Yanan
Abstract:The Interpretations on Issues Concerning the Concrete Application of Law in Handling Criminal Cases of Impairing Credit Card Management released by the Supreme People’s Court and the Supreme People’s Procuratorate further prescribes that restrictive conditions for the crime of malicious overdraft will be failure to repay the money one has overdrawn for over three months with the issuing bank’s two times of dunning.In judicial practice,however,there exist such controversial issues as how to understand the failure,how to determine the two times of dunning and how to calculate the three-month debt extension.These issues are discussed in the article.
Keywords:malicious overdraft  taking illegal possession as the purpose  two times of dunning  failure to repay the money one has overdrawn for over three months
本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号