|
|||||
|
|
| 俄罗斯联邦刑事诉讼中犯罪人有罪证明中的相关问题 | |
| 引用本文： | B·B·望德舍夫,C·A·彼得罗萨夫,元轶,王冰清. 俄罗斯联邦刑事诉讼中犯罪人有罪证明中的相关问题[J]. 证据科学, 2009, 17(6): 742-753 |
| 作者姓名： | B·B·望德舍夫 C·A·彼得罗萨夫 元轶 王冰清 |
| 作者单位： | 1. 圣彼得堡法学科学院刑事司法教研室 2. 中国政法大学比较法学研究院 3. 中央民族大学 |
| 摘 要： | 《俄罗斯联邦刑事诉讼法典》第15条明确了辩论制原则，但其存在一定的负面效果。该法第86条的证据收集规则使有悖于指控倾向的事实材料、非国家机关性质诉讼参与人取得的鉴定结论及专家结论一律无法归入案卷。这打破了审前诉讼阶段的控辩平等，违背了刑诉法．最终导致了案件客观真相难以查明的后果。 |
| 关 键 词： | 俄罗斯联邦刑事诉讼法 辩论制 证据收集 鉴定结论 客观真相 |
The Issues Related to Proof Gguilt in Russian Federal Criminal Procedure Law |
|
| V.V.Vandyshev,S.A.Betrozov,Yuan Yi,Wang Bingqing. The Issues Related to Proof Gguilt in Russian Federal Criminal Procedure Law[J]. Evidence Science, 2009, 17(6): 742-753 | |
| Authors: | V.V.Vandyshev S.A.Betrozov Yuan Yi Wang Bingqing |
| Affiliation: | V. V. Vandyshev, S.A. Betrozov, Yuan Yi. Criminal( Department of Saint Petersburg State Law Academy, 192012. Translated by Yuan Yi, Wang Bingqing. China University of Political Science and Law, 100088; Central University for Nationalities, 100081.) |
| Abstract: | Article 15 of the Russian Federation Code of Criminal Procedure provides the ＂principle of the adversary＂ system. However, it bears certain negative effects. The ＂rules of evidence collection＂ provided by Article 86 makes the factual materials contrary to the tendency of the allegations , identification conclusions provided by the non-state departmental participants in the proceedings and an expert opinion impossible to be included in case files. It breaks the equality of the prosecution and the defense at the pre-trial stage of the proceedings and violates the Criminal Procedure Law, thus making the objective truth of the case difficult to identify. |
| Keywords: | Russian Federation Code of Criminal Procedure Advesary System Evidence Collection Identification Conclusions Objective Truth |
| 本文献已被 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ | |