法院的公共政策形成功能：比较与定位

尽管有学者认为,我国已现实地建立了违宪审查制度,但中国法院参与公共政策的现实方式仍然是司法解释。在对国外特别是美国和德国法院参与公共政策形成的方式进行比较的基础上,对中国法院参与公共政策形成的方式进行了分析即可得出结论,认为中国法院既不能以司法解释的形式,也不能以违宪审查的方式参与公共政策形成,判例是法院参与公共政策形成的最佳方式。

The Function of Courts Participating the Public Policy: Comparison and Location

Though some scholars thing that the Judicial Review system has been set up in our country,the realistic way that China Courts participate the public policy is still judicial interpretation.On he basis of carried on comparative research of participation the public policy out of our country especially for the Courts in America and German,through analyzing the realistic way that China Courts participate the public policy,the article comes to conclusions that China Courts participate the public policy through neither the way of judicial interpretation nor the way of judicial review,and example of judgment is the best way that Courts participate the public policy.