论定罪剩余的犯罪构成事实转化为量刑情节

定罪情节和量刑情节在刑事审判工作中具有重要地位,严格区分定罪情节和量刑情节的界限正确认识罪责刑三者之间的关系,是正确定罪和公正量刑的重要保障。定罪情节与法定刑密切相关,而量刑情节与宣告刑紧密相联,二者泾渭分明,然而在量刑研究和司法实践中,却往往将定罪情节与量刑情节混为一谈,这种眉毛胡子一把抓的“估堆”式量刑模式,违反了“同一事实情况禁止重复评价”这一国际通行的原则直接造成了处罚的畸轻畸重,从而严重影响量刑的公正性。如何正确区分定罪情节与量刑情节,特别是揭示定罪剩余的犯罪构成事实转化为量刑情节的客观性和规律性,是建立相对完备的量刑情节体系的关键所在本文力图通过对这一问题的深入探讨,进一步推进中国量刑制度的公正性和透明化。

On the transformation of the crime-forming facts left in the condemnation proceeding into details for penalty-measurement

The details of a case in both the declaration of a crime and the measurement of penalty are of great significance in the work of criminal trial. To strictly distinguish the limitation between the details for condemnation and those for penalty measurement and to correctly recognize the relationship among the crime, the fault and the penalty are important safeguard for correct condemnation and for just penalty measurement. How to distinguish the limitation between the details for condemnation and those for penalty measurement, especially to reveal the objectivity and regularity of the transformation of the crime-forming facts left in condemnation into details of a case in penalty measurement, is the key to establishing a relatively perfect system of the details for penalty measurement.