The Principle of Generic Consistency as the Supreme Principle of Human Rights |
| |
Authors: | Deryck Beyleveld |
| |
Institution: | (1) Durham Law School, University of Durham, Durham, UK;(2) Ethics Institute, University of Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands;(3) Durham Law School, University of Durham, 29/30 Old Elvet, Durham, DH1 3HN, UK |
| |
Abstract: | Alan Gewirth’s claim that agents contradict that they are agents if they do not accept that the principle of generic consistency
(PGC) is the supreme principle of practical rationality has been greeted with widespread scepticism. The aim of this article
is not to defend this claim but to show that if the first and least controversial of the three stages of Gewirth’s argument
for the PGC is sound, then agents must interpret and give effect to human rights in ways consistent with the PGC, or deny
that human beings are equal in dignity and rights (which idea defines human rights) or that they are agents (and hence subject
to any rules at all). Implications for the interpretation of the international legal system of human rights inspired by the
Universal Declaration of Human Rights 1948 are sketched. |
| |
Keywords: | |
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录! |
|