首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

滥伐林木行为承担法律责任的现状及其缺陷分析
引用本文:周珂,厚文. 滥伐林木行为承担法律责任的现状及其缺陷分析[J]. 现代法学, 2004, 26(5): 65-69
作者姓名:周珂  厚文
作者单位:中国人民大学,北京,100872
基金项目:国家林业局《野生动植物保护立法方法论研究》项目的成果之一(项目编号:36504002)
摘    要:对滥伐林木行为追究刑事责任时存在因法律规定不协调而导致行为人规避法律,量刑偏低,罚金畸轻的缺陷;对滥伐林木行为追究行政责任时存在行政处罚的执法阻力较大,征收罚款的理论依据不足的缺陷。加之用罚金或罚款代替民事赔偿、罚金和罚款的管理使用未考虑生态保护因素等缺陷,致使无法有效遏制滥伐林木行为。有必要重新界定民事责任与行政责任、刑事责任的界线,重新设计有效率的民事责任制度。

关 键 词:滥伐林木  刑事(法律)责任  行政(法律)责任  民事(法律)责任
文章编号:1001-2397(2004)05-0065-05
修稿时间:2004-08-05

The Present Structure of Liabilities for Wanton Timber Cutting and Its Defects
ZHOU Ke,HOU Wen. The Present Structure of Liabilities for Wanton Timber Cutting and Its Defects[J]. Modern Law Science, 2004, 26(5): 65-69
Authors:ZHOU Ke  HOU Wen
Abstract:While investigating wanton timber cutting offences, people may find the following distressing issues. Suspects may circumvent their punishments because of loopholes in inconsistent laws. Some penalties may be too light or the fine too small. In pursuing administrative liabilities for wanton timber cutting, people may find other problems: resistance to administrative punishments or lack of adequate provisions for imposition of a fine. In addition, practice of substituting fines for damages and management and application of fines without considering ecological protection bring about the effect that wanton cutting cannot be restrained effectively. Therefore, it is necessary to re - delineate civil liability, administrative liability and criminal liability, and to restructure an efficient civil liability regime.
Keywords:wanton timber cutting  criminal (legal) liability  administrative (legal) liability  civil (legal) liability
本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号