论法律疑罪的本质及克服

法律疑罪是指不同解释主体对同一刑事法律条文的含义作出了有争议的理解。法律疑罪的本质在于不同解释者个体的价值判断存在差别。为了克服法律疑罪,必须促使不同解释者在个体价值判断上的趋同。同时,当价值判断出现一定差异时,还应该存在一种说服机制,以便缩小价值判断之间的差异。法律论证对说服目的的实现具有重要意义,它应包括两个方面的内容:一是法律论证的程序;二是法律论证的一般方法。

The Essence of Disputed Crime and Its Solution

Disputed Crime means that controversial interpretations of a provision of the criminal law are given by different interpreters,the essence of which lies in that the judgment values of the interpreters vary.To solve this problem,the interpreters should be encouraged to have their judgment values fused.Further,where their decision values differ,a persuasive mechanism should be set up so as to try to thrash out the difference.Legal argumentation is of vital importance for the persuasive effect the content of which should contain two aspects: procedure and general methods.