《民法典·婚姻家庭编》之我见

尽管 2 0 0 1年《婚姻法》(修正案 )取得了可喜的进步 ,但作为一个阶段性、过渡性的立法措施 ,其制度性的缺失以及内容的失之过简 ,难于操作 ,使其仍然有很大的修改空间。民法的法典化为婚姻法的第二步修订提供了极好的机会。完善婚姻家庭法就应当按照法律规范的科学性、前瞻性、实用性 ,全面、系统地对婚姻家庭关系的各项制度作出明确具体的规定 ,而非该制度的纲要性规范。

My View on the Part of Marriage and Family in the Civil Code

Although great progress has been made in the Marriage Law (Draft) in 2001, as a periodic and transitional legislative measure, the institutional limitation, the simplicity of its subject, and the hardness to practice, make it have a lot to modify. The codification of the Civil Code provides a good chance for the second step revision of the Marriage Law. To perfect the law of marriage and family, the explicit and detailed provisions about all the institutions of marriage and family relations should be comprehensive and systematically made in accordance with the legal norms with the character of being scientific, predictive, and practical, but not the compendium norms of the institutions.