On the Nature of Tolerance: Dichotomous or Continuous?* |
| |
Authors: | James L. Gibson |
| |
Affiliation: | (1) Department of Political Science, Washington University in St. Louis, Campus Box 1063, 219 Eliot Hall, St. Louis, MO, 63130-4899, United States;(2) Centre for Comparative and International Politics, Stellenbosch University, Stellenbosch, South Africa |
| |
Abstract: | The purpose of this article is to reconsider the claim made recently by Mondak and Sanders that political tolerance ought to be thought to be a dichotomous rather than continuous variable. Using data from both Russia and the United States, I demonstrate that those Mondak and Sanders regard as uniquely tolerant are most likely no more than people who were given insufficient opportunity to express their intolerance. Even if such a phenomenon of “absolute tolerance” exists (all ideas expressed in all ways are to be tolerated), it is sufficiently rare that few practical implications are indicated for those doing empirical work on political tolerance and intolerance. * I appreciate the valuable comments of Jeffcry Mondak on an earlier version of this paper. |
| |
Keywords: | political tolerance measurement dichotomous concepts |
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录! |
|