民事诉讼中当事人商定举证期限与法院指定举证期限之应然关系

确定一个合理的举证期限既是科学设置举证时限制度的必备内容,也是其得以良性运作的重要前提。对于举证期限的确定,有关司法解释虽然明确了当事人商定和法院指定两种不同的方式,但却没有能够作出细致的规制。鉴于此,本文分析了有关规定在司法实践中存在的主要问题,检讨了当事人商定举证期限和法院指定举证期限各自的利弊得失,并在此基础上为进一步理顺二者之间的应然关系提出了完善建议。

Reasonable Relation Between Parties' Bargaining and Court's Appointing Term of Adducing Evidence

It's necessary to confirm a reasonable term of adducing evidence for scientificly setting up the time limit of adducing evidence system.At the same time,it's an important precondition for the smooth function of the system.As for confirming the term of adducing evidence,some judicial interpretations prescribe two ways,they are parties' bargain and court's appointment,but there is no meticulous regulation on concrete application and how to harmonize the relationship between them.Therefore,the article analyzes the main problems in the judicial practice,meditates the advantages and disadvantages of the two ways,and brings forward the advice of establishing the reasonable relation between the the two ways.