国际关系学科中美国的知识霸权

美国国际关系研究在国际关系学科中是否处于知识霸权地位,是国际关系学者关注的主题之一。本文试图比较欧美学术期刊以探讨此问题,即《国际研究季刊》、《国际组织》、《欧洲国际关系》、《国际研究评论》。本文选取上述四份权威期刊在1997年-2006年期间所刊发的论文为分析文本,侧重分析论文作者的国籍、研究主题及研究方法,进而探讨美国国际关系研究在学科中地位的变化问题。进而尝试从不同角度探讨如何改变美国知识霸权的路径,包括对美国国际关系研究的优点及缺失的充分认识、国际关系学科史的重述等问题。

On American Intellectual Hegemony in the Discipline of International Relations

Whether the study of international relations in America holds an intellectual hegemonic position in the discipline of international relations is one of the research subjects for international relations scholars. The author attempts to analyze this question through a comparison of European and American academic periodicals, such as International Studies Quarterly, International Organizations, European Journal of International Relations and Review of International Studies. The author will choose the articles published by these four periodicals during the past ten years, analyze the authors' nationality and research subjects, and discuss the change of position of America's study of international relations in this discipline. And then the author will discuss the ways of changing American intellectual hegemony, including recognizing the strong points and shortcomings of the study of international relations in America and describing anew the history of the discipline of international relations.