首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     检索      

权利之间的界限——以美国宪法第一修正案为中心
引用本文:熊静波.权利之间的界限——以美国宪法第一修正案为中心[J].现代法学,2007,29(4):15-22.
作者姓名:熊静波
作者单位:南京大学,法学院,江苏,南京,230091
摘    要:表达自由与其他宪法权利的规范语句只是作为一种预设存在,它们在水平效力的延展上都是有限度的,彼此之间也是有界限的,所谓的界限主要通过对于权利范围的限制来体现,而在对权利作限制时,其核心部分不应受到憾动。在个案情形下,任何一方的胜出,都会对另一方构成限制,而任何一清晰的主张完全可能会被确认,也完全有可能会被驳倒,指望在两个权利之间划定一条什么固定不变的界限好方便断案是不现实的,权利之间的界限有赖于法益衡量。

关 键 词:权利冲突  界限  衡量
文章编号:1001-2397(2007)04-0015-08
修稿时间:2007年4月2日

Demarcation Line Between Rights: A Perspective of the First Amendment to US Constitution
XIONG Jing-bo.Demarcation Line Between Rights: A Perspective of the First Amendment to US Constitution[J].Modern Law Science,2007,29(4):15-22.
Authors:XIONG Jing-bo
Abstract:Freedom of expression and other constitutional rights are anticipate norms and are restricted as to the extension of their horizontal effects.Further,demarcation lines exist between these rights.The scope of a right is deemed as a test in drawing the so-called dividing line.While restricting,however,the core part of any right cannot be interfered with.In any case,any party's prevailing means that the other party's right is restricted.Also,it may well be that an explicit claim is recognized or overturned.As such,hanging on the hope that a fixed demarcation line should be drawn between two rights is by no means realistic.Indeed,the demarcation is dependent upon balancing of interests.
Keywords:conflict of rights  demarcation line  balance
本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号