Multilateral CBMs on the Korean Peninsula: Making a virtue out of necessity |
| |
Authors: | Dong‐Ik Shin |
| |
Institution: | Research associate at the International Institute for Strategic Studies (IISS) , 23 Tavistock Street, London, WC2E 7NQ, UK E-mail: E‐mail: shin@iiss.org.uk |
| |
Abstract: | Abstract As its economy has become near to collapse, North Korea has tried to avoid direct contacts with South Korea because of the ‘absorption phobia’. Instead, the North has made continuous efforts to improve its relations only with the United States, seeking a guarantee for its survival. Given this circumstance, this paper argues that useful multilateral approaches such as KEDO and Four‐Party Talks will contribute to improving inter‐Korean relations. Thus, it would be sensible to explore every possible way (even through multilateral mechanisms) until both Koreas make a breakthrough for the deadlocked inter‐Korean CBMs. But the multilateral CBMs constitute a transitional and complementary role as South and North Korea should be primarily responsible for addressing major problems such as reunification. Among the multilateral approaches, the Four‐Party Talks will be a most useful mechanism which will enable the two Koreas to resume dialogue for the peace and reunification on the Korean Peninsula. In this peace process, more positive roles of major powers are also requested. |
| |
Keywords: | Korea South‐North Basic Agreement CBMs multilateralism Geneva Agreed Framework KEDO Four‐Party Talks reunification |
|
|