同案同判的宪政意义及其实证研究

同案同判应当是法律适用平等原则的体现。但本文对 1 1 0 7个案件的实证分析结果表明 ,应然的平等原则以及法律规范本身并不能成为同等法律适用对象之间的唯一等价物 ,仅仅根据某种情况适用了某个法律规范 ,并不能确切地预见同等情况也一定会适用同一法律规范。为此 ,本文提出了解决同案异判问题的两个对策

On the Constitutional Implication of "Like Case, Like Treatment"

To accord consistent judgments to similar cases is the requirement of equity principle in the application of law. However, based on the empirical study of 1107 cases, this article elucidates that such conclusion could not be drawn so simply in fact, namely, real trials indicate that different judgments have been inflicted on similar cases. Thereupon, this article also brings forward two possible approaches to the said discrepancy existing between cases and those judgments.