| 论我国的雇主替代责任制度 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 李富民. 论我国的雇主替代责任制度[J]. 河南省政法管理干部学院学报, 2011, 26(1): 37-41 |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 李富民 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 河南财经政法大学,河南,郑州,450002 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 2003年最高人民法院关于人身损害赔偿的司法解释以及即将正式实施的《侵权责任法》对雇主替代责任的配置有失均衡,不符合我国当前社会发展的需要,对于雇主替代责任,在其责任的构成要件上,应当以雇员执行职务时对他人造成损害的行为构成侵权为前提;我们顺应现代立法潮流,借鉴两大法系国家侵权法的规则,使雇主替代责任建构符合侵权法的一般原理,在规定雇主承担严格责任的同时,规定雇员也应当就其实施的侵权行为对受害人承担侵权责任,并不考虑其是一般过失,还是存在故意或重大过失。雇主应当和雇员共同就其雇员实施的侵权行为对受害人承担连带责任。
|
| 关 键 词： | 侵权 雇佣关系 人身伤害 雇主替代责任 |
On China's Employer Vicarious Liability System |
| |
| Li Fumin. On China's Employer Vicarious Liability System[J]. Journal of Henan Administrative Institute of Politics and Law, 2011, 26(1): 37-41 |
| |
| Authors: | Li Fumin |
| |
| Affiliation: | Li Fumin (Henan University of Economics and Law,Zhengzhou,Henan 450002) |
| |
| Abstract: | The judicial explanation of Supreme People's Court about personal injury in 2003 is not consistent with the configuration of employer vicarious liability in the Tort Liability Law to be officially implemented and goes against the demand of China's current social development.As for employer vicarious liability,the components of liability should premise that the harmful behavior of employees to others in performing their duties constitutes infringement;conforming to modern legislation trend and referring to t... |
| |
| Keywords: | infringement employment relation personal injury employer vicarious liability |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
|
