| 自媒体言论构成诽谤罪的判断标准 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 王超凡. 自媒体言论构成诽谤罪的判断标准[J]. 天水行政学院学报, 2014, 15(4): 102-106 |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 王超凡 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 华东政法大学,上海,200042 |
| |
| 基金项目： | 本文为华东政法大学研究生创新能力培养专项资助项目“自媒体言论构成诽谤罪的判断标准研究”（项目编号：20142228）的研究成果. |
| |
| 摘 要： | 自媒体诽谤就性质而言,仍然是诽谤,同样适用诽谤罪的犯罪构成.但是自媒体诽谤与传统诽谤的认定标准并不完全相同,应当根据自媒体的特征视具体情况区别对待,尤其是当行为对象是国家工作人员时要采取更为严格的定罪标准.另外,诽谤罪是侵害犯,当诽谤罪与侮辱罪发生竞合时认定为诽谤罪为宜.
|
| 关 键 词： | 自媒体 诽谤罪 区别对待 |
The Research on Judgement Standard of We-Media Speech Constituting Crime of Defamation |
| |
| WANG Chao-fan. The Research on Judgement Standard of We-Media Speech Constituting Crime of Defamation[J]. , 2014, 15(4): 102-106 |
| |
| Authors: | WANG Chao-fan |
| |
| Affiliation: | WANG Chao-fan (East China University of Political Science and Law, Shanghai 200042, China) |
| |
| Abstract: | We-Media defamation, in terms of the nature, is still a libel, and it applies to constitution of the crime of defamation yet. But identification criteria of We-Media defamation and traditional defamation is not exactly the same. We should make a difference between them according to the characteristics of the We-Media, especially, adopt more stringent standard of conviction when the object is national staff. In addition, libel is offense of consequence. That is appropriate for hbel when the crime of defamation and insult exist concurrence. |
| |
| Keywords: | we-media crime of defamation deal with each case on its merits |
| 本文献已被 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
|
