刑事附带民事诉讼之客体分析--对附带民事诉讼赔偿范围的思考

基于对刑事实体法与刑事程序法中所使用"经济损失"与"物质损失"概念内涵与外延的理解不一,同时受民事案件审理中对精神损失判决赔偿的影响,审判实践中,在刑事附带民事诉讼中是否应对被害人精神损失予以赔偿各地做法不一.刑事法律规范明文规定对附带民事诉讼赔偿范围仅限定于财产性损失,但立法的规定从未中止理论界探索的脚步,随着对人权观念的重视,要求进行精神损害赔偿的呼声越来越高,将理论界在附带民事诉讼中能否提起精神损害赔偿之诉的两种对立观点的剖析,无疑对司法实践有所裨益.

An Analysis of the Object of Supplementary Civil Action In Criminal Proceeding--A Consideration to the Extent of Compensation In Accessorial Civil Action

Based on the different understandings to the connotation and denotation of the concept of "economic loss" and "material loss" used in criminal substantive law,and also influenced by the compensation for the emotional suffering judgment in adjudication of the civil case,there exists different practices whether the victims should get the compensation for emotional suffering in civil action attached to criminal case in the practice of the trial.Criminal law norms stipulate in explicit terms that the extent of compensation in the case of accessorial civil action is only confined to the loss of property,but the legislative provision never suspend the seeking footsteps in the theoretical field.With the attention to the conception of human rights,more and more people claim compensation for emotional suffering.Therefore,it is undoubtedly very beneficial to judicial practice on analysis of opinions opposite to each other on whether the compensation for the emotional suffering can be put forward in the case of accessorial civil action in the theoretical field.