公司僵局救济方式的比较分析

公司僵局是公司经营过程中极易产生、在实践中亟待解决的一个公司治理难题.公司僵局的本质在于公司治理机构失去行动能力而无法有效从事经营活动.世界各国对公司僵局救济方式的探究中起重要作用的有:赋予异议股东股权收购请求权,指定监管人和临时董事,引入退出权与除名权,公司分立等多种替代性措施,以及司法裁判解散等公力救济措施.各国救济路径为将多种替代性措施的私力救济作为司法介入的前提.因此,我国处理公司僵局案件时,应借鉴各国的不同方法,根据具体案情,将以上替代性措施作为裁判解散公司的前置性条件,以求更妥当地处理公司僵局问题.

Comparative Analysis of the Remedy Ways of Corporation Deadlock

Corporation deadlock is one of the problems that can’t be avoid and propose to be resolved during the running of the corporation.The essence of the corporation deadlock is the situation that the administrative organizations of one corporation lose the ability of running and can’t act effectively.Countries have taken an active part in the studying and practices of the remedies ways to break the deadlock,one is the alternative measures,namely objection to claim for acquisition of the shareholder,designation supervision and temporary director,introduction of exit right and removed from power,and the split of company.The other is public protection,such as the judicial referee dissolved.Each country’s remedy ways put the alternative measures first.So,we should consider of the different ways to remedy the corporation deadlock,focusing on the case,putting the proper alternative measures before the judicial referee dissolves,in this way,dealing with this problem carefully and skillfully.