首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

区别而论的责任体系:《鹿特丹规则》履约方制度的引入——兼论《中华人民共和国海商法》的选择
引用本文:王秋雯. 区别而论的责任体系:《鹿特丹规则》履约方制度的引入——兼论《中华人民共和国海商法》的选择[J]. 中国海商法年刊, 2010, 21(4): 24-31
作者姓名:王秋雯
作者单位:清华大学法学院,北京,100084
摘    要:联合国大会2008年12月通过的《鹿特丹规则》引入了全新的主体制度,即履约方制度。在面对困扰中国海事司法实践已久的港口经营人法律地位问题时,有学者认为履约方制度恰能解决该问题;在当前修改《中华人民共和国海商法》(简称《海商法》)的背景下,海商法学界也出现了呼吁将履约方制度引入《海商法》的观点。但是,履约方制度并不能解决港口经营人的全部问题,解决《海商法》现有问题也并非只能依赖履约方制度的引入。

关 键 词:《鹿特丹规则》  履约方制度  港口经营人

Differentiated liability system: incorporating the performing party under the Rotterdam Rules what may be the choice for Chinese Maritime Code
WANG Qiu-wen. Differentiated liability system: incorporating the performing party under the Rotterdam Rules what may be the choice for Chinese Maritime Code[J]. Annual of China Maritime Law, 2010, 21(4): 24-31
Authors:WANG Qiu-wen
Affiliation:WANG Qiu-wen(Law School,Tsinghua University,Beijing 100084,China)
Abstract:On 11 December,2008 the UN General Assembly adopted the Rotterdam Rules.The performing party is a new concept under the Rotterdam Rules.In the Chinese maritime law academia,some scholars propose that the performing party may address port-operators-related issues which have bothered China's judicial practice for long due to the legislative vacuum.Some scholars further advocate introducing the performing party into Chinese Maritime code in the background of amendment.Nevertheless,a divergent opinion different...
Keywords:the Rotterdam Rules  the performing party  port operators  
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号