| 论选择性罪名 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 黄京平,彭辅顺.论选择性罪名[J].山东警察学院学报,2004,16(2). |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 黄京平 彭辅顺 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 中国人民大学法学院,北京,100872 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 目前我国的选择性罪名存在七种类型。确定选择性罪名的根据有三个层面,其直接根据是选择性罪状,间接根据是犯罪构成,最终根据是犯罪的社会危害性。选择性罪名既有其存在的价值,又有其固有的缺陷。适当限制选择性罪名的数量和规定对实施选择性罪名中数行为的犯罪人从重处罚是弥补其缺陷的两条主要途径。
|
| 关 键 词： | 选择性罪名 选择性罪状 犯罪构成 社会危害性 |
On Alternative Charges |
| |
| HUANG Jing-ping,PENG Fu-shun.On Alternative Charges[J].Journal of Shandong Police College,2004,16(2). |
| |
| Authors: | HUANG Jing-ping PENG Fu-shun |
| |
| Abstract: | Currently, alternative charges in China can be divided into seven types. In the determination of an alternative charge, the direct foundation is the alternative count, the indirect foundation is the constitution of the crime and the ultimate foundation is its social harmfulness. Alternative charges have their significances as well as defects. There are mainly two ways to remedy the defects: one is limiting the number of alternative charges and the other is giving a heavier punishment to the criminals committing several acts in an alternative charge. |
| |
| Keywords: | alternative charge alternative count constitution of a crime social harmfulness |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
|
