首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

美、德、日公司监督机制模式的比较与借鉴
引用本文:赵云雷. 美、德、日公司监督机制模式的比较与借鉴[J]. 河北青年管理干部学院学报, 2006, 0(1): 52-54
作者姓名:赵云雷
作者单位:沈阳师范大学,辽宁,沈阳,110034
摘    要:世界各国公司监督机制立法模式不同。英美法系的美国公司采用一元制模式,独立董事制度是监督机制的核心。大陆法系的德、日公司采用二元制模式,监事会制度是监督机制的核心,而德、日又有所不同。我国亦采用二元制模式,但监事会却存在着“形同虚设、监督不力”的状况。因此,应该借鉴世界各国先进的立法经验,重新审视和构建我国的公司监督制度,选择一个适合我国实际情况的公司监督机制模式。

关 键 词:监督机制  模式  独立董事  监事会  制度
文章编号:1008-5912(2006)01-0052-03
修稿时间:2005-12-07

Comparison among Supervision Models in American, German,and Japanese Corporations
Zhao Yun-lei. Comparison among Supervision Models in American, German,and Japanese Corporations[J]. Journal of Hebei Youth Administrative Cadres College, 2006, 0(1): 52-54
Authors:Zhao Yun-lei
Abstract:The legislation patterns among companies in different countries are different.The American companies adopt single-pattern model under British and American legal system,in which the independent Board Directors System is the core of its supervision system.While Germany and Japan adopt dual-pattern model under the Mainland legal system,in which the Board of Supervisors System is the core.But there are some differences between German companies and those of Japan.We also use the dual-pattern,but the Board of Supervisors has the phenomenon of "formalism and insufficient supervision".Therefore,we should draw references from the advanced legislation experiences from other countries,re-examine and construct our company supervision system,select a suitable model to suit our company supervision system.
Keywords:supervision system pattern  Independent Board Directors System  Board of Supervisors  System
本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号