| 对寻衅滋事罪之“强拿硬要”的司法认定 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 陈小恒,刘孝晖. 对寻衅滋事罪之“强拿硬要”的司法认定[J]. 河南公安高等专科学校学报, 2008, 17(3): 59-61 |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 陈小恒 刘孝晖 |
| |
| 作者单位： | [1]湖南女子大学旅游管理系,湖南长沙410004 [2]慈溪市人民检察院,浙江慈溪315300 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 由于寻衅滋事罪与其他犯罪在构成要件上存在一定程度的重合，其行为方式“强拿硬要”与抢劫罪、敲诈勒索罪的手段行为区分并不明显，因而在司法实践中往往对其难以把握，造成了执法上的一定困难。但寻衅滋事罪之“强拿硬要”在主观犯意、客观罪责上与侵财型犯罪存在显著区别，所以，对其进行认定时应当遵循主客观相统一的原则，同时还应考量该行为情节程度上的入罪限制。
|
| 关 键 词： | “强拿硬要” 主观犯意 客观罪责 入罪限制 |
A Judicial Determination on Defiance and Affray Crime of Taking away Forcefully |
| |
| Affiliation: | CHEN Xiao-heng, LIU Xiao-hui (1 .Hunan Women University, Changsha Hunan China 410004; 2.Department of Prosecution of Cixi in Zhejiang Province, Cixi Zhejiang China 315300) |
| |
| Abstract: | Because of the existence of a certain degree of coincidence between defiance and affray crime and other criminal elements, it is difficult to grasp their behavior in judicial practice and there is no clear distinction between acts, these cause the enforcement of certain difficulties. However, the crime of creating trouble ＂to forcefully take away＂ dolus subjective, objective responsibility for the crime and other types of crime against property were significantly different from the way for the offence of ＂forcefully take away＂ seize. The unity should be guided by the principle of the objective and subjective, consideration the extent of the circumstances of the crime restrictions. |
| |
| Keywords: | ＂Take away forcefully＂ Subjective dolus Objective guilt Convicted restrictions |
| 本文献已被 维普 等数据库收录！ |
