| 中英律师制度比较 |
| |
| 引用本文： | 宁静,王威. 中英律师制度比较[J]. 广西政法管理干部学院学报, 2007, 22(2): 117-119 |
| |
| 作者姓名： | 宁静 王威 |
| |
| 作者单位： | 1. 广西师范大学法学院,广西,桂林,541004
2. 广西政法管理干部学院,广西,南宁,530022 |
| |
| 摘 要： | 律师制度是一个国家法治建设的重要组成部分.英国的律师制度有许多值得我国借鉴的地方.本文试从中英两国律师执业资格的取得、律师的分类及业务范围、律师的管理体制、律师的纪律与惩戒制度等方面进行比较,从而发现我国律师制度中存在的不足以及提出了一些完善的建议.
|
| 关 键 词： | 比较 律师制度 英国 中国 |
| 文章编号： | 1008-8628(2007)02-0117-03 |
| 修稿时间： | 2006-12-10 |
Chinese and England''''s banister system comparison |
| |
| NING Jing,WANG Wei. Chinese and England''''s banister system comparison[J]. Journal of Guangxi Administrative Cadre Institute of Politics and Law, 2007, 22(2): 117-119 |
| |
| Authors: | NING Jing WANG Wei |
| |
| Abstract: | The barrister system is a national government by law construction important constituent. England's barrister system has many is worth our country model the place. This article tries England attorneys the disciple of a master qualifications to obtain, attorney's classification and the business scope, attorney's management aspect and so on system, attorney's discipline and disciplinary punishment system carries on the comparison, thus discovered in our country barrister system exists the insufficiency as well as put forward some perfect proposals . |
| |
| Keywords: | Compared with Barrister system England China |
| 本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录！ |
|
