首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

两大法系陪审制度比较研究
引用本文:丁以升. 两大法系陪审制度比较研究[J]. 贵州警官职业学院学报, 2007, 19(6): 5-10
作者姓名:丁以升
作者单位:华东政法大学,上海,200042
摘    要:西方国家的陪审制度有两种运作模式,一种是英美法系的陪审团制,另一种是大陆法系的参审制。这两种陪审制度的主旨都在于吸收普通民众参与诉讼,从而将“民间智慧”和“大众理性”引入司法领域,但是,在具体的制度设计上,二者之间则存在着明显的差异。这些差异的形成,与两大法系各自的司法制度和法律文化传统密切相关。

关 键 词:陪审制度  陪审团制  参审制  英美法系  大陆法系
文章编号:1671-5195(2007)06-0005-06
修稿时间:2007-09-20

Comparison Research on Jury System of the Two Western Legal Systems
Ding Yi-sheng. Comparison Research on Jury System of the Two Western Legal Systems[J]. Journal of Guizhou Police Officer Vocational College, 2007, 19(6): 5-10
Authors:Ding Yi-sheng
Affiliation:Ding Yi-sheng(East China University of Politics and Law Science,Shanghai 200042,China)
Abstract:In western countries,the jury system has two kinds of operating pattern,of which one is the jury collective of UK-US legal systems,the other is the jury join-in of EU mainland legal systems.Their purpose is to allow the goneral pubilc into legal action,and lead "popular wisdom" and "masses reason" into judiciary field.But there are also obvious differences,being related to their own judicial systems and legal cultural tradition,in concrete designation between these two systems.
Keywords:jury system  jury collective system  jury join-in system  UK-US legal systems  EU mainland legal systems.
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号