首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

国家司法中民间习俗的影响力评析——中国语境中哈特与德沃金之争的反思
引用本文:余俊. 国家司法中民间习俗的影响力评析——中国语境中哈特与德沃金之争的反思[J]. 现代法学, 2011, 33(4): 41-48. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-2397.2011.04.04
作者姓名:余俊
作者单位:西南政法大学,重庆,401120
基金项目:2010年教育部人文社会科学研究西部和边疆地区项目“与自然保育有关的传统知识法律保护制度研究”(10XJA820006)
摘    要:作为一种司法改革举措,民间习俗在一些法院中得到运用,民间习俗对国家司法的影响力也就成为需要法理论证的问题。在中国语境中反思哈特与德沃金关于此问题的观点,他们的思想仍有许多启发作用。哈特通过承认规则塑造了习俗的有效性,而德沃金则通过权利原则将习俗引入国家司法。尽管哈特与德沃金意见有所分歧,但他们从不同视角提供了习俗进入司法的实践方法。

关 键 词:民间习俗  国家司法  哈特与德沃金之争  中国语境

Impact of Folk Customs upon National Justice:Reflection of Hart/Dworkin Debate in chinese Context
YU Jun. Impact of Folk Customs upon National Justice:Reflection of Hart/Dworkin Debate in chinese Context[J]. Modern Law Science, 2011, 33(4): 41-48. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-2397.2011.04.04
Authors:YU Jun
Affiliation:YU Jun (Southwest University of Political Science and Law,Chongqing 401120,China)
Abstract:As a measure for judicial reform, folk customs are being adopted in some Chinese courts,which has inevitably urged us to determine the impact of folk customs upon national justice from the perspective of jurisprudence. Hart and Dworkin’s arguments on this issue, considered in the Chinese context nowadays,are still of enlightenment and reference meanings.Hart thought that rules of recognition was the ultimate one that determined the existence and validity of customs while Dworkin maintained that rights as described by principles were trumps,which the practice and the institutions of the society would be geared to protect.Despite their dispute,Hart and Dworkin both suggested alternative approaches to the judicial practice.
Keywords:folk customs  national justice  Hart/Dworkin debate  Chinese context  
本文献已被 CNKI 万方数据 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号