刑法第四百三十八条第二款的理解与适用 |
| |
引用本文: | 冉巨火. 刑法第四百三十八条第二款的理解与适用[J]. 河南公安高等专科学校学报, 2014, 0(6): 99-102 |
| |
作者姓名: | 冉巨火 |
| |
作者单位: | 西北政法大学军事法研究中心,陕西西安710063 |
| |
基金项目: | 国家社科基金青年项目“军职罪修改的体系化设计研究”(12CFX037)的阶段性研究成果. |
| |
摘 要: | 刑法第四百三十八条第二款同样是特殊法条,将该款规定中的处罚解释为定罪处罚不具有正当性,军人盗窃、抢夺部队枪支、弹药、爆炸物的行为应认定为盗窃、抢夺武器装备罪。出于罪刑相适应的考虑,对上述行为量刑时应适用刑法第一百二十七条第二款的法定刑。从立法论角度来看,刑法第四百三十八条第二款的规定存在缺陷。对此,可经由补正解释的路径来纠正这一错误。
|
关 键 词: | 盗窃、抢夺武器装备罪 盗窃、抢夺枪支、弹药、爆炸物罪 补正解释 |
The Understanding and Application of Paragraph 2 Article 438 of the Criminal Law |
| |
Affiliation: | RAN Ju - huo(Researeh Centre of Military Law, Northwest University of Polities and Law, Xi' an Shaan Xi China 710063 ) |
| |
Abstract: | Paragraph 2 article 438 of the Criminal Law is also a special law. It is improper to interpret the word "punished" here as "convicted and punished". The action of an army man' s stealing or seizing firearms, ammuni- tion or explosives should be convicted as the crime of stealing or seizing weaponry. Considering the principle of suit- ing punishment to Crime, the sentencing should apply to paragraph 2 article 127 of the Criminal Law. There is a flaw in paragraph 2 article 438 from the legislative perspective, which can be corrected by amendable interpreta- tions. |
| |
Keywords: | Crime of stealing or seizing weaponry Crime of stealing or seizing firearms, ammunition or explosives Amendable interpretation |
本文献已被 CNKI 维普 等数据库收录! |