论共同犯罪中被告人互证的证据价值

共同犯罪的被告人供述除具备单纯被告人陈述的特征之外还有其自身的特点--利益上的相互冲突,在作证的心理上必然形成一定的心理障碍.因此,对于共同被告人陈述的证明力能否直接作用于其他被告人,理论上一直存在争议.以区分共同被告人的不同类型为视角,厘清理论争议的焦点及其理论基础,在肯定共同被告人陈述具有互证的证明力的同时,应当进一步强调补强证据规则的适用.

On Proof Value of the Interconfession of the Defendants in Complicity

In addition to the characteristic of the pure confession of defense,the confession of the defendants in complicity also has its specialty-mutual conflict of benefits,which cannot but make certain mental obstacles during the process of proof.Accordingly,a theoretical controversy about whether or not the probative force of a joint-offender can function in other accused directly,has been existing at all time.From the perspective of the different type of the common accuseds,this article wants to clarify the focus of the controversy and its theoretical foundation,with the viewpoint that should emphasize the proof-complement rule further at the time of affirming the interconfessional weight of proof of the joint offenders' confessions.