Campaign styles: Persistency in campaign resource allocation |
| |
Affiliation: | 1. Institute for European Global Studies, Political Science Department, University of Basel, Switzerland;2. Amsterdam Institute for Social Science Research, The Netherlands;1. Political Science Department, San Diego State University, San Diego, CA 92182-4427, USA;2. Faculty of Political and Administrative Sciences, Babeş-Bolyai University, Cluj-Napoca, Romania;1. Washington University in St. Louis, United States;2. University of Pittsburgh, United States;3. University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, United States |
| |
Abstract: | How do candidates allocate their campaign resources and when do they change their allocations? Using data of over 3.5 million expenditure items submitted by candidates who ran for House seats between 2004 through 2014, we provide a detailed picture of how candidates allocate their limited resources among different categories of activities. Although different candidates running in the same race allocated their campaign resource differently, in the aggregate, monthly expenditure patterns over the course of the campaign period across six election cycles are similar. Also, from one cycle to the next, candidates rarely changed their campaign resource allocations, even when they face varying qualities of challengers, different sets of voters due to redistricting, and increases in outside spending after Citizens United. This suggests that candidates’ expenditure decisions are sticky across election cycles. We show additional evidence of this persistency by documenting repeated contractual relationship with the same consultants and campaign vendors by campaigns. |
| |
Keywords: | |
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录! |
|