首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     


Socializing Democrats: Examining Asian American vote choice with evidence from a national survey
Affiliation:1. Population, Policy and Practice Programme, UCL Institute of Child Health, London, UK;2. Perinatal Prevention of AIDS Initiative, Odessa, Ukraine;3. Shupyk National Medical Academy of Postgraduate Education, Kiev, Ukraine;1. Department of Political Science, 1000 Faner Drive, Room 3165, Southern Illinois University, Carbondale, IL 62901-4501, United States;2. Texas Tech University, Department of Political Science, Box 41015, Lubbock, TX 79409-1014, United States;1. Wits Business School, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa;2. Professor of Finance at Wits Business School, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa;1. Centro de Investigación y Docencia Económicas, Mexico;2. Washington University in St. Louis, United States;1. School of Civil & Construction Engineering, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR 97331, USA;2. Livermore Software Technology Corporation, Livermore, CA 94551, USA
Abstract:Asian Americans are increasingly voting for Democrats in national elections. High levels of Democratic vote choice among Asian Americans are notable because many have high incomes, immigrated from countries with communist histories, or are Evangelical Christians. Why do Asian Americans support Democrats despite these conservative predispositions? I develop a novel theory of “social transmission” to explain Democratic vote choice among Asian Americans. The theory predicts that Asian Americans, who receive limited partisan socialization through the family, develop partisan preferences partly through the diffusion of political views in local contexts. This process leads to Democratic support because Asian Americans tend to settle in liberal metropolitan areas of the United States. I test this theory as an explanation for Asian American vote choice using data from the 2008 National Asian American Survey. In support of the theory, local partisan context emerges as a moderately-sized predictor of vote choice alongside some established predictors, including national origin and religion. Some measures of social integration into local communities heighten the effects of partisan context on vote choice. The results hold across various tests for self-selection and after accounting for several alternative explanations, including socioeconomic status, religion, national origin, group consciousness, and perceived discrimination.
Keywords:
本文献已被 ScienceDirect 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号