国际商事仲裁中的临时保护措施制度——兼议我国相关制度的不足

临时保护措施制度作为对财产或人身产生强制力的措施,其执行必然涉及到强制性权力的介入,如一国之司法权力。在仲裁独立于法院的原则之下,法院可否以及怎样介入到国际仲裁临时措施制度中?作者认为,尽管仲裁当事人均持仲裁独立、排斥法庭介入之主张,但临时措施制度的本质决定了必须寻求法庭权威力量的介入。不过,有鉴于仲裁独立原则,法庭的介入可表现为支持、帮助,而非干涉仲裁,这种观点也在大多数国家的立法、仲裁规则或有关文件中予以认可。

Improving Interim Measures in International Arbitration

Interim measures of protection play an essential role in many legal systems in facilitating international commercial arbitration. However, given the indispensable involvement of coercive power, such as same from juridicial authority, the inevitable conflict arises, largely, which relates to the debates about the acceptable degree of court intervention within the arbitral process. This paper finds that though there does exist the tension between the preservation of party autonomy and the need for coercive sovereign power, now, certain policies have been increasingly realized in international arbitration world that the intervention of the courts is not necessarily disruptive of the arbitration. It may equally be definitely supportive. This tide is echoed by many systems for a fine-tuning international commercial arbitration world. However, the Chinese legislative systems lag far behind the rest of the world.