对我国传统教唆犯理论的质疑

我国传统的教唆犯理论存在难以自圆其说的弊端：一、并非一切教唆行为在实践中都能按照教唆犯处理；二、要求教唆他人必须实施某一种具体犯罪才成立教唆犯与我国刑事立法实践不相符合；三、要求教唆犯对被教唆人的刑事责任能力和主观故意作出判断也是不现实的。因此，应对传统教唆犯理论进行改造。首先将现有的教唆犯概念一分为二，即教唆犯和唆使犯；其次，对分离出的教唆犯的基本构成条件进行重构。

A Query on the Traditional Instigation Theory of China

There're some drawbacks in traditional instigation theory of China. Firstly, not all the instigative acts can be decided as instigation crime in practice; Secondly, it doesn't tally with our criminal legislative practice that an instigator must have committed some concrete crimes before the constitution of this crime; Thirdly, it isn't realistic for an instigator to make judgments about criminal capacities and subjective intentions of the instigated persons. Therefore, the traditional instigation theory should be perfected by dividing the concept of instigator into instigator or abettor and reforming the constitution requisites to crime of abetment