票据质押三论

票据质押合同没有采用书面形式的票据质押合同不成立而非无效。即使当事人没有采纳书面形式,但是出质人将票据交付质权人占有的,质押合同之形式瑕疵得以补正,合同仍然成立。交付不再是票据质押合同的生效要件而是票据质权之生效要件。背书是票据质押的生效要件而非对抗要件,我国《物权法》第224条之规定与《票据法》第35条之规定并不冲突,只是二者观察问题的角度不同而已。票据之现实交付、简易交付与指示交付可以设定质押,而占有改定则不能。

Three Questions about Impawn

When Impawn contract of bill does not requires written form,it isn't tenable,which is not invalid.Formal flaw of impawn contract is corrected when parties don't use written form but the pawner delivers bill to Pawnee,it is still tenable.Delivery of bill is not effective condition,but it is effective condition of impawn of bill.Endorsements of bill are effective condition to impawn,but not confront condition.224 provision of law about real right doesn't confront with 35 provision of law about bill,which observe question from different angles.Actual delivery,simple and easy delivery and indicative delivery of bill can set impawn,but exchange of occupation can't.