首页 | 本学科首页   官方微博 | 高级检索  
     

新行为无价值论的中国展开
引用本文:周光权. 新行为无价值论的中国展开[J]. 中国法学, 2012, 0(1): 175-191
作者姓名:周光权
作者单位:清华大学法学院;
摘    要:对于在犯罪论体系中处于重要地位的实质违法性论问题,有重视"恶果"的结果无价值论和重视"通过‘恶行’造成‘恶果’"的(二元的)行为无价值论的对立,但我国刑法学界对这两种理论的研究尚未充分展开。合理的违法性论应该考虑某种身体动静如何通过对行为规范的违反造成法益损害,以建立一种"新行为无价值论"。这个意义上的(二元)行为无价值论不会使处罚范围扩大化,不会侵犯人权;同时,仍然坚守客观违法性论立场,不会混淆违法和责任的界限。新行为无价值论能够将犯罪论和刑罚论有机地统一起来,肯定刑罚积极的一般预防目的,也与我国当前的社会发展状况、立法倾向、司法实务相契合。

关 键 词:行为规范违反  法益指向性  新行为无价值论  积极的一般预防  客观归责理论

The Development of the New Conduct without Value Theory in China
Abstract:With regard to the problem of the theory of substantive illegality playing an important part in crime theory system,an antagonism exists between the consequence without value theory emphasizing "bad consequences" and the(dual) theory of conduct without value emphasizing "‘bad consequences’caused by ‘criminal behaviors’".The study of these two theories,however,has not been well developed in the field of criminal law in China.The theory of reasonable illegality should consider how certain movement of body causes harm to legal interests through violating the code of conduct with a view to establishing a "new conduct without value theory".The(dual) theory of conduct without value in this sense will not extend the scope of penalty or breach human rights;in addition,continuing to hold the standpoint of the theory of objective illegality will not obscure the confines of liability and responsibility.The new conduct without value theory can make crime theory and penalty theory unite harmoniously,confirm the positive aim of general prevention of penalty and agree with the current situation of social development,legislative tendency and judicial practice.
Keywords:
本文献已被 CNKI 等数据库收录!
设为首页 | 免责声明 | 关于勤云 | 加入收藏

Copyright©北京勤云科技发展有限公司  京ICP备09084417号