从《物权法》第106条的规定审视我国的善意取得制度

善意取得制度适用范围的扩大,是我国《物权法》的一大特点,将善意取得制度扩大适用于不动产,体现了对交易安全的着重保护,然而考察传统民法的体系可以发现,对不动产的交易安全,往往是由公示公信原则来保护的,这样的体系在大多数大陆法系国家的民法典中也得到了一致的遵循。那么,将善意取得适用于不动产后,如何与公示公信原则衔接便成了一个重要的问题。考察《物权法》草案,可以发现,原本的善意取得有四个要件,而最后出台的《物权法》删去了其中的“转让合同有效”这一要件,这一修改很难找出其学理上的依据,且与民法体系不合。

Examine Our Country's Acquirement of Good Faith From the Perspective of No.106 Article of Law of Rights over Things

The sphere expansion of application of the acquirement of good faith has been one obvious characteristic of our country’s Law of Rights over Things, especially, the expansion to immovable property, has embodied the protection to safe business. However, when examining the traditional system of civil law, you will find that the protection tends to be realized by the principle of public summons, which has also got consistent abiding in civil code by great majority civil law countries. Then, after a goodfaith has been got, how to link with public summons becomes a critical question. If inspecting the draft of ＂Law of Rights over Things＂, we can find that, among the original four improtant conditions, ＂assignable contract being efffective＂ has finally been deleted, which is really lack of theoretical basis and not accord with the system of civil law.