Expert Testimony on Psychological Injury: Procedural and Evidentiary Issues |
| |
Authors: | Michael Finch Catherine Guthrie Carol Henderson |
| |
Affiliation: | 1. College of Law, Stetson University, Gulfport, FL, USA 2. National Clearinghouse for Science, Technology and the Law, Stetson University, College of Law, Gulfport, FL, USA 3. American Academy of Forensic Sciences, Colorado Springs, CO, USA
|
| |
Abstract: | This article introduces psychologists to aspects of the legal process most pertinent to their role as expert witnesses in civil litigation. It summarizes the role of psychological evidence in the adjudication of common law tort claims, the structure of the court system, and the stages of the litigation process. It also explains the various roles a psychological expert may play during litigation and the implications of those roles for expert confidentiality and disclosure. The article then provides an overview of legal policy governing the admissibility of psychological expertise, especially as admissibility is affected by the “Daubert” standard applied in most North American courts. |
| |
Keywords: | |
本文献已被 SpringerLink 等数据库收录! |
|